|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 9:56 AM
|
charleroi

Posts: 77
|
I thought this was a PHism but I saw it on here today with mention of the FFRR if you need to differentiate between a Range Rover and a Sport can't RRS be used, they even call clios FF when talking about cup packages or something. Calling normal coke Full Fat Coke is bad enough FFs.
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 10:15 AM
|
Jobbo

Posts: 38154
|
Why would RRS help if you're describing a FFRR?
--
[OO=[|]=OO]
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 10:21 AM
|
mik

Posts: 12516
|
It is how they are referred to by the owners of FFRR, RRS, Disco3/4 etc etc.  Ergo it is correct. for examplification
Updated January 25, 2013 at 10:22 AM
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 10:22 AM
|
Jobbo

Posts: 38154
|
I've seen the Disco3 and 4 referred to as D3 and D4 recently. Without context I thought the posters were talking about small diesel engined Volvos.
--
[OO=[|]=OO]
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 10:24 AM
|
mik

Posts: 12516
|
They are badged LR3 and LR4 in the USA, but I agree - D3 and D4 is stupid. Sounds like something Rev would have said. 
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM
|
Swervin_Mervin

Posts: 8374
|
I might start using the term semi-skimmed as well if it bothers you that much.
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM
|
charleroi

Posts: 77
|
Jobbo said... Why would RRS help if you're describing a FFRR?
Because if you're describing a Range Rover RR is enough, I presume FF started to distinguish between that and a sport.
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 11:10 AM
|
Jobbo

Posts: 38154
|
I would counter that RR isn't enough, since it's no longer just an RR; RR is now a brand (including the Ewok, the FFRR and the RRS).
--
[OO=[|]=OO]
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM
|
mik

Posts: 12516
|

I swear you have an insult monitoring system running on here.
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 11:51 AM
|
Mito Man

Posts: 4689
|
It is just forum talk though. If you see someone driving a FFRR and tell them' "hey that's a nice full fat range rover you have there" they'd probably punch you in the face 
--
Formal education will make you a living; self-education will make you a fortune.
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 11:59 AM
|
Mark BT52

Posts: 11056
|
Mito Man said... It is just forum talk though. If you see someone driving a FFRR and tell them' "hey that's a nice full fat range rover you have there" they'd probably punch you in the face
Prove it.
--
Impreza WRX STi Spec-C V-Limited Toshi Arai Edition/ GTR/ Panda 100HP Pandamonium/ Insignia CDTi 160
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM
|
240PP

Posts: 1095
|
Until recently I thought that the FF part meant the V8 petrol version, for some reason 
--
This ^
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 12:11 PM
|
Bunta

Posts: 6272
|
Mark BT52 said... Mito Man said... It is just forum talk though. If you see someone driving a FFRR and tell them' "hey that's a nice full fat range rover you have there" they'd probably punch you in the face
Prove it.

Go on young Sales - make a video please.
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 1:12 PM
|
Rich B

Posts: 21357
|
charleroi said... Jobbo said... Why would RRS help if you're describing a FFRR?
Because if you're describing a Range Rover RR is enough, I presume FF started to distinguish between that and a sport.
Well I agree with you.
--
Cheers Rich
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 1:35 PM
|
John

Posts: 5476
|
As do I. I've also heard it used to describe non cup equipped Clios.
--
"I've never driven a BMW that I've really loved, except for perhaps the first M Coupe. That was a proper hooligan's hot rod" David Yu
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 1:47 PM
|
Swervin_Mervin

Posts: 8374
|
It's used to describe the full fa...sorry, the normal RSport Clios. So mine was a FF with Cup chassis, not a Cup.
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 2:04 PM
|
Rich B

Posts: 21357
|
Swervin_Mervin said... It's used to describe the full fa...sorry, the normal RSport Clios. So mine was a FF with Cup chassis, not a Cup.
Well that's just daft.
--
Cheers Rich
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM
|
Swervin_Mervin

Posts: 8374
|
Rich B said... Swervin_Mervin said... It's used to describe the full fa...sorry, the normal RSport Clios. So mine was a FF with Cup chassis, not a Cup.
Well that's just daft.
Yeah. I think it should be Full Fat for non-Cup equipped cars, semi-skimnmed for cars equipped with Cup chassis, and skimmed for Cup cars. 
|
|
Posted on Friday, January 25, 2013 at 4:23 PM
|
Rich B

Posts: 21357
|
Swervin_Mervin said... Rich B said... Swervin_Mervin said... It's used to describe the full fa...sorry, the normal RSport Clios. So mine was a FF with Cup chassis, not a Cup.
Well that's just daft.
Yeah. I think it should be Full Fat for non-Cup equipped cars, semi-skimnmed for cars equipped with Cup chassis, and skimmed for Cup cars.
it would be better, though the fact they already have names also helps...!
--
Cheers Rich
|
|